Governance Efficiency
|
Less duplication, streamlining decision-making, and
reducing administrative costs.
|
More tailored governance, but may duplicate effort,
increasing admin costs.
|
No formal local governance and reliance on a unitary authority with
limited local responsiveness.
|
Financial Strength & Precept
|
Larger precept* base spreads the financial burden more
evenly, enabling broader projects and services.
|
Smaller councils may require higher precepts to sustain
service levels.
|
No precept retained locally; no funding or budget control
at parish level.
|
Local Voice & Representation
|
Stronger position with higher-tier authorities due to
larger size and capability.
|
More personalised representation for smaller communities,
but less strategic leverage.
|
No directly elected local body to represent the community’s
interests or advocate on local issues.
|
General Power of Competence (GPC)**
|
Easier to meet legal criteria to retain GPC and expand
local powers.
|
Some councils may not meet eligibility for GPC, limiting
their powers.
|
No legal authority or powers at community level; all
matters handled centrally.
|
Economies of Scale
|
Efficient service delivery through shared contracts and
staffing across three villages.
|
Loss of economies of scale can increase the cost of
services.
|
No local procurement or coordination of services.
|
Parish Identity and Community Cohesion
|
Fosters collective identity and shared goals across all
three communities.
|
Reinforces the unique identities of each village.
|
Reduced civic identity and fewer opportunities for local
engagement without formal representation.
|
Strategic Project Delivery
|
Greater capacity for larger infrastructure and
multi-village projects through shared resources and staff.
|
Focus on hyper-local projects; may lack capacity for major
initiatives.
|
No structured means to plan, fund or deliver community-led
projects.
|
Staffing and Expertise
|
Resources to employ qualified, full-time staff for
compliance, projects, and support.
|
Smaller councils may depend on part-time or volunteer
staff.
|
No dedicated staff; no administrative capacity to support
residents or manage local matters.
|
Resilience and Continuity
|
Greater resilience to staffing and councillor turnover;
operations can continue with less disruption.
|
Smaller councils may struggle if key roles are unfilled or
if councillor numbers fall.
|
No local democratic continuity; loss of community-led
decision-making and institutional memory.
|